Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than Nokia 9 PureView, getting a score of 78.9 against 76.4. Although it's the best phone in this review, it must be noted that it is also a a little heavier and somewhat thicker phone. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880. Nokia 9 PureView has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a less mega-pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a larger camera aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a greater memory for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy M20 features a way better battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 51% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.