Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a 78.9 score against 75.8. Even though Galaxy M20 and nubia Red Magic 3S were only released 8 months apart, Galaxy M20 is a bit thinner and lighter. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a little bit larger display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger camera aperture and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy M20 and nubia Red Magic 3S count with incredibly similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.