Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Sonic silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having a 78.9 score against 76.2. The Galaxy M20 is an older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. These devices come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little lower display density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a quite bigger display.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a camera with a much higher resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy M20 features a greater storage to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 features a bit better battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.