Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 score. Galaxy A50 is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than the Galaxy M20, even when both of them were released only a few months apart. Galaxy A50 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per display inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M20. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos and a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy M20 counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.