Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Samsung Galaxy M20, with a 90.7 score against 78.9. Galaxy A52 is a way newer and a bit thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy M20, but it's also just a little heavier. The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy M20 has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh. Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality, a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.