Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Galaxy M20, with a score of 91.3 against 78.9. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the Galaxy M20.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G has a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a much larger sensor, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a way more MP back-facing camera and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Galaxy M20 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.