Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is slightly better than the Galaxy A70, with a global score of 78.9 against 76.9. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). Galaxy M20 is a better device than the Galaxy A70, it must be noted that it's also somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A70 counts with a display that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy M20's screen, because although the Galaxy A70 has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy M20 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy M20 has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.