Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, getting an 88.1 score against 78.9. The Galaxy F62 is a noticeably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F62 has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10.
The Galaxy F62 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy F62 counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
Galaxy F62 has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy F62 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a larger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a 40% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.