Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than Samsung Galaxy M20, with a score of 97.6 against 78.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, giving some additional features and optimized performance. Even though Galaxy Fold and the Samsung Galaxy M20 were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy Fold's design is a lot thinner but much heavier.
The Galaxy M20 and the Samsung Galaxy Fold count with quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a larger screen. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M20 features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
The Galaxy Fold features a superior camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a less mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a much bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.