Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note3's 77.7 score. Galaxy M20 is a much newer device than the Galaxy Note3, although it's a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy M20, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM. Galaxy M20 features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a little bigger screen.
Galaxy M20 features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M20 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Galaxy Note3 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Note3 also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.