Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than the Galaxy M20, having an 88.3 score against 78.9. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy M20, although both of them were released only a few months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a better screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a better number of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S10 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much larger aperture and a larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.