Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Samsung Galaxy M20, having a overall score of 89.7 against 78.9. The Galaxy S10 Lite is a just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy M20, but both of them weight the same. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy M20 has a little better battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.