Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is a bit better than Galaxy M20, with an 86.3 score against 78.9. Galaxy S10e is a lighter and thinner cellphone than Galaxy M20, even though both were only released with a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a way bigger camera aperture.
The Galaxy S10e has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy M20 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.