Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Galaxy M20's score of 78.9. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Galaxy M20, but both have the same thickness. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a quite greater pixel count in each screen inch, a quite bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and Galaxy M20 have really similar battery durations.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.