Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a global score of 93.4, which is much better than Galaxy M20's 78.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is notably newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy M20. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10, giving some extra features and performance tweaks.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a quite better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy S22 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures, a much higher video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features superior battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.