Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy M20's general score of 78.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a somewhat heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy M20, but both of them have the same thickness.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a camera with a way better resolution, a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture and a lot better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy M20.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.