Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-05 | -- |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, having a overall score of 90.7 against 78.9. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely thinner and lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy M20.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot better display than Galaxy M20, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures, a bigger aperture, a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's battery life is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy M20.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.