Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-02-05 | -- |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M20, with an 80.9 score against 78.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version. Galaxy S6 Active features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy S6 Active features a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, although it has a lesser mega pixels back facing camera, a lot lower 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a tinier camera sensor, they both have a same size aperture. The Galaxy M20 features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.