Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy M20 design is incredibly newer and thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy S7 Active's processor is very similar to Samsung Galaxy M20's CPU, and although the Galaxy S7 Active has an inferior number of cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
Galaxy M20 has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Galaxy M20 counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.