Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M20, with an 80.1 score against 78.9. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, providing you a lot of extra features and enhanced performance. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy M20, although it is a lot thicker and notably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M20. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier aperture and a tinier back camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also counts with a camera with more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Galaxy M20 both count with very similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and equal internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy M20 features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.