Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, having an 81 score against 78.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, providing you some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy M20, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M20. They have the same amount of pixels in each inch in the display, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a display with the same size. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy M20. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy M20 and the Galaxy XCover Pro both have really similar memory capacity to install applications and games, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor taking way lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy M20 counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.