Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M20's 78.9 general score. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is newer, a little lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M20.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a little bigger display, a just a little better pixel quantity per display inch and a quite better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip features a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a back-facing camera with less MP resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy M20 counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.