Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy M20, having a 92.3 score against 78.9. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is newer, somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy M20. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a little larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a less MP camera, it also counts with a larger aperture, a lot better video resolution and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features a much better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.