Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 overall score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10, so it counts with some nice extra features and optimized performance. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and notably thinner, but also heavier than Galaxy M20.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy M20 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.