Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZs, getting a general score of 78.9 against 77.2. The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a newer cellphone than the Sony Xperia XZs, but it is heavier and just a bit thicker. The Xperia XZs has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy M20, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), they both have the same RAM memory amount.
Sony Xperia XZs features a little bit better screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xperia XZs, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh. Sony Xperia XZs takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.