Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the Xperia Z4v's 78.8 overall score. Even though Galaxy M20 is extremely newer than the Xperia Z4v, it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M20 has a more recent 10 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version.
Xperia Z4v has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the display. The Xperia Z4v has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Xperia Z4v counts with a superior camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M20 features a superior battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.