Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the Xperia Z5's 77.6 general score. The Galaxy M20 design is way newer, but thicker and heavier than the Xperia Z5. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy M20 has the newer 10 version while Xperia Z5 has Android 5.1.
Xperia Z5 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy M20, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z5 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Sony Xperia Z5 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Sony Xperia Z5 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy M20 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z5, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy M20 has a really longer battery life than Xperia Z5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.