Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-23 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M21 has a general score of 84.1, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 global score. Galaxy M21's design is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Google Pixel 4. Google Pixel 4 has a screen that's just as good as the Galaxy M21 one, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a quite better screen pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy M21 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M21 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Galaxy M21 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M21 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M21 features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.