Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-23 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M21's 84.1 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but LG K92 has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy M21 has Android 11. Even though the LG K92 and the Samsung Galaxy M21 were released with only a couple of months difference, LG K92's construction is a little heavier but just a little thinner.
Samsung Galaxy M21 has a little faster processor than LG K92, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy M21 counts with a little more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit better display pixels density.
The LG K92 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M21, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M21 has a much longer battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
LG K92 takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also has a larger aperture and a camera in the back with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.