Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-23 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M21 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a general score of 84.1 against 81.9. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy M21 construction is noticeably older, a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy M21 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much brighter screen, a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the display and a slightly better 1256 x 2760 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M21, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M21 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 has a way better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures, a better 50 megapixels resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.