Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy M21, having an 87.1 score against 84.1. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer and just a little thinner device than Galaxy M21, although it's a little bit heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Galaxy M21 has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some extra features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy M21 has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M21, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a much brighter display and a little bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rate, a larger camera aperture, a back camera with more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M21, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M21 counts with better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.