Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M21 has an overall score of 84.1, which is much better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M21 has an older 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Although Samsung Galaxy M21 is notably newer than the Moto Z Force, it's somewhat heavier and thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 counts with a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy M21 also has 4 more cpu cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit sharper display than Galaxy M21, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M21 features a much better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M21 also counts with a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy M21 features a superior battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 71 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.