Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-23 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M21 has an overall score of 84.1, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 general score. Even being the best we compare here, we must highlight that it's also a somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M21 has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features.
The OPPO Find X2 features a brighter screen than Galaxy M21, because it has a greater pixels amount per inch in the display, a higher 1440 x 3168px resolution, a way brighter screen and a bit bigger screen. OPPO Find X2 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M21, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M21, and although they both have a camera with a 48 MP, a 0.5 inches camera sensor and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Galaxy M21 features a much better battery performance than OPPO Find X2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.