Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-23 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Ocean |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M21 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a general score of 84.1 against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy M21's construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it is a little lighter. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M21 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy M21, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a sharper display than Galaxy M21, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, more pixels per inch of display, way more brightness and a little bigger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M21, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video, higher video frame rate and a way bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy M21, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M21 has a much longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.