Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-23 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Galaxy M21, having a score of 98.9 against 84.1. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy M21, and both were released with only 5 months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy M21 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M21, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a bit larger display and a little bit higher screen pixels density. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy M21, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M21, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy M21 has superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M21, because it has a lot bigger sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos, a lot higher video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.