Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-23 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M21 is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 84.1 score against 80.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy M21 and Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy M21 is extremely thinner and a lot lighter. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M21 has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M21. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M21, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better number of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy M21 one, both of them have equal internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy M21 counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy M21 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.