Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M30, having an 88.1 score against 82.4. The Apple iPhone X construction has the same weight than Samsung Galaxy M30, but it is just a little thinner. The iPhone X features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixel count in each inch of display and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
The iPhone X counts with a quite better performance than Galaxy M30, because although it has 2 less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. Galaxy M30 has a little bit more memory for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M30 has a superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. IPhone X takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.