Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M30's score of 82.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M30.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M30. Both have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a little better pixels density.
The Galaxy M30 counts with a much better memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M30 counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a lesser megapixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a larger sensor and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.