Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30's 82.4 general score. Google Pixel 5 is a newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M30. The Google Pixel 5 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 5 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 5 takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy M30 has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M30 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M30 has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.