Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 394 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is slightly better than the HTC U11, getting a general score of 82.4 against 77.6. Although Samsung Galaxy M30 is newer than HTC U11, it's just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. The HTC U11 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy M30, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The HTC U11 has just a bit better display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy M30 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The HTC U11 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M30, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy M30 has a way better battery life than HTC U11, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.