Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-07 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit's 77 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M30 is better than LG G7 Fit, we must highlight that it's also a just a little thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has 9.0 Pie version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version, so it counts with a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The LG G7 Fit has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The Galaxy M30 counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a way better battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
The LG G7 Fit takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy M30, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos and videos in low light environments, and they both have a 0.32 inches back camera sensor, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a more megapixels camera in the back and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.