Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy M30's 82.4 score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG G8X ThinQ's construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy M30, but it is just a little heavier.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy M30. Both have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory. LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
LG G8X ThinQ features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a lesser MP camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a much better 3840x2160 video definition and a larger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with longer battery performance than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.