Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has a score of 82.4, which is a bit better than the LG V10's general score of 78.6. The Galaxy M30 is a notably newer device, and it's also just a little thinner and just a little lighter than LG V10. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy M30 has 9.0 Pie version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it counts with some extra features and increased performance.
LG V10 has a sharper screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a better pixel amount per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a little better performance than LG V10, because it has 7 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V10 counts with a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V10 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with more MP, a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy M30 counts with a much longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.