Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 is a little bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having a score of 82.4 against 81.2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy M30 has 9.0 Pie version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10, providing some extra features. Although the Galaxy M30 is better than the LG V40 ThinQ, we must highlight that it's also a a little heavier and just a little bit thicker phone.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a same size display, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a better screen pixels density. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M30, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M30. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy M30 counts with a way better battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The LG V40 ThinQ features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better video quality, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.