Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30, getting an 87.6 score against 82.4. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than Samsung Galaxy M30, it's extremely heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Galaxy M30, because it has a quite larger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a quite better display density. The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a much larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ and Galaxy M30 both count with really similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.