Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting an 82.4 score against 78.5. The Galaxy M30 design is notably older, a little heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy M30 has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12, so it counts with lots of additional features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy M30 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a better display than Galaxy M30, because it has a just a bit higher screen density, a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M30 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a lot higher video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in low light environments, a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.