Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy M30, getting an 83.4 score against 82.4. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is way newer than the Galaxy M30's, but it's a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite lower pixel amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite larger display. The Galaxy M30 counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy M30 features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot more megapixels back camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.