Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M30's global score of 82.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a notably newer and just a bit thinner phone than Galaxy M30, but it's a little heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a much larger aperture for better low light images and video, a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a lot better (4K) video resolution and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.