Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M30's 82.4 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is way newer than the Galaxy M30's, but it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker.
Galaxy M30 features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a lot better resolution camera in the back, a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture for better low light images.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy M30, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.