Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is slightly better than Moto G Power's score of 76.1. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy M30 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version, so it gives a couple additional features and some performance improvements. Even though the Galaxy M30 is older than the Moto G Power, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Moto G Power counts with a display that is very similar to the display in Galaxy M30, and although the Moto G Power has a just a bit greater display pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px, they both have a screen with the same size. Galaxy M30 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy M30 also has more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G Power has just a bit better performance than Galaxy M30, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Moto G Power's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy M30 one. Motorola Moto G Power shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger sensor, a back-facing camera with a higher resolution and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.